Huge News – Thai Prime Minister pledges to end ivory trade

No Gravatar

The World Wildlife Fund reports Thai Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra has pledged to work on ending the ivory trade in her country. A petition calling for this move was signed by more than 1.5 million people.

The WWF quotes the Prime Minister as saying -

As a next step we will forward amending the national legislation with the goal of putting an end on ivory trade and to be in line with international norms.

The WWF also called Thailand the “world’s largest unregulated ivory market.” So this decision could really save the lives of many endangered elephants.

We can only hope this happens – very soon. Evil acts of greed like this need to be fought everywhere.

 

Wacky Mentality Quote of the Day

No Gravatar

A member of the Washington State House of Representatives reportedly has stated bicyclists create more pollution than motorists. Yes, this appears to be a true story. But I hope it is not.

A RawStory.com article reports State Rep. Ed Orcutt tried to tie a bicyclist’s increased rate of respiration with increased pollution. When contacted by a blogger about the comment, Orcutt took his wacky take a step further, as reported by The Raw Story:

Reached for comment, Orcutt told Seattle Bike Blog that “you would be giving off more CO2 if you are riding a bike than driving in a car,” although he admitted to having no evidence to back the claim.

Why do people like this make such tin-foil-hat claims? Don’t they know about the news media and the Internet and really important stuff like say … science and facts?

The article moved on to cite comparisons with auto emissions. Okay that’s fine. But why not ask Orcutt if he realizes what he is really suggesting. If our collective act of breathing – and even exercising – adds to pollution, then the more people, the more pollution. If Orcutt thinks he’s right, then he should be pushing for strategies to reduce human population growth.

But what comes out of the tailpipe of a car is far more than what we discharge naturally with breathing – at least for most of us.

But I compare this with some local news stories in my home state a few years back that blamed wildlife for pollution in local waterways. So we drain off millions of acres of wetlands and mow down wildlife habitat and pave paradise and some people want to blame the wildlife for going to the bathroom.

What are they supposed to do, find portable toilets to use?

 

The IdiocyRod Sled Race begins in Alaska

No Gravatar

Yet another IdiocyRod Sled Race has started in Alaska – something commonly known as the Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race. The name is derived from the word “idiot.” – Or at least the founders wanted to open the door for animal-welfare types like me to change it to IdiocyRod.

People who don’t yet understand the suffering the dogs endure, regularly praise the people who ride in the sled behind the dogs, as if they are somehow considered athletes. Let’s get this strait – they ride along in the sled. Sure – it’s cold out. But people get more work in by shoveling a long driveway after a big snowstorm.

I know supporters of the IdiocyRod will try to claim I don’t know what I’m taking about. (It’s a weak try, but they might try.) They’ll claim the dogs get great care and that the biped participants are world-class athletes. Yeah – right. And puppy mill operators and the greyhound racing industry always claim their dogs get the best care and that they truly love animals. Thankfully, most people don’t buy it.

The first real sports story from this annual event will only arise when the humans are strapped in front of the sled and the dogs get to ride in the back. Or better yet, just leave the dogs inside where it’s warm and comfy and let the humans pull around sleds loaded with bricks for hundreds of miles or more.

I’d actually watch that event on TV.

 

Animal Welfare Legislative Update for March 2

No Gravatar

A number of areas in the country are debating new animal-welfare regulations. I hope this is a good sign.

Nevada: The state’s lawmakers are considering two bills – in regard to reporting animal cruelty data and to toughen anti-cockfighting rules.

Ohio: The State House is looking to increase the penalties for the mistreatment of kennel animals. For current law, it is a misdemeanor. One representative can’t understand how Nitro’s Law has passed twice before in the House, but failed in the Senate.

New York: An assemblyman in Albany, NY is calling for harsher criminal penalties for cases of animal cruelty. The bodies of two Pitbull-Sheperd mixes was found on train tracks last week.

Alabama: A bill to increase the penalties for animal cruelty and expand the definition made its way out of the Alabama House’s agriculture committee on Wednesday.

 

A disgusting promotion of the greyhound racing industry

No Gravatar

I found a particularly disgusting editorial about dog racing on the Pack News Wire – under the headline, Queensland Greyhound Racing – It Needs to Change.” When I saw the headline, on the Australian Racing Greyhound website, my first thought was that the writer wanted some positive changes, maybe to protect the dogs. I was wrong.

The writer’s phrasing is a bit troubling at a number of points in the text. He uses the phrase “product” in a statement about encouraging people to get involved in the industry. He calls racing a “thrill.”

He worries there are more negative Facebook pages about dog racing than positive pages. I can offer an explanation for that – the news out of racing is negative. He wants the comments about the horrors of racing to change.

So no push for eliminating the horrors – just a desire to stop the negative comments. What he wants is better propaganda.

What people with compassion want is an end to the abuse.

 

 

Ag-gag laws called ‘sinister’

No Gravatar

I like wording. Editors of the Journal of Animal Ethics are using the phrase ‘sinister’ to describe Ag-gag laws. These new laws that have cropped up in at least a couple of states criminalize undercover video and audio recordings of abuse on factory farms. The actual goal of the laws are not to really to protect the privacy of the landowners. The goal is to hide abuse from the eyes of the public.

Sinister is right. These factory farms want to hide their practices. And without a means to uncover cruelty, the cruelty will go on.

A received the following press release concerning this topic:

“” “”

U.S. AG-GAG LAWS “SINISTER” SAY LEADING ACADEMICS

Leading academics have branded United States “Ag-gag” laws, now in force in Iowa and Utah and awaiting consideration in other U.S. states, that make it a criminal offence to photograph or make a sound or video recording of an animal facility without the owner’s permission, as “sinister”.

The editors of the Journal of Animal Ethics (JAE) recently published by the University of Illinois Press Professors Andrew Linzey and Priscilla N. Cohn note that the objections to these laws seem to have been “insufficiently regarded in the preceding debates in these states, so perhaps they need to be spelled out”.  They list five reasons for concern:

Continue reading Ag-gag laws called ‘sinister’ →

More info on PUPS Act

No Gravatar

The reintroduction of the PUPS Act in the US Congress, which would close the Internet loophole for puppy sellers – and help crack down on puppy mills – is incredibly important.

I want to publicize this as much as possible, so when I see news stories or columns cross the Pack New Wire, I will post them here on the blog.

KOMO News reports breeder Wendy Laymon’s kennel facility -

….has not been inspected by the USDA since the feds pulled her license. Her puppy mill in Snohomish County was raided in 1999, dogs seized, and Laymon sent to jail.

And Opposing Views highlighted Laymon’s operation Friday, reporting she began selling dogs over the Web as soon as she was released from jail – through the Internet loophole.

AND in related news, protestors from Maine Citizens Against Puppy Mills lined up outside a pet store on February 23. The Scarborough Leader ran an article on Friday about the group’s effort. A quote from the store’s website was included, claiming over 8,000 breeders are regulated by the USDA. – Really? – Is this suppose to give customers some confidence?

We need to see the passage of the PUPS Act, to close the gaping loophole in the laws, and we need more effort poured into enforcement and regular inspections for all commercial breeding operations. Shutting down puppy mills and seriously regulating dog and cat breeding will save taxpayer funds in the long run. And it will help to save lives and end suffering.

 

 

Tragic death of show dog will hopefully shine a light on practice of debarking

No Gravatar

News sites and networks are abuzz today with the news that a dog who appeared in the recent Westminster Dog Show has died. The dog’s guardian claims he was poisoned and points to an individual she claimed became upset in a holding area when they heard “Cruz” had been debarked.

The media has paid very little attention to the debarking revelation. While Cruz’s death – poisoned or not – is a tragedy, I think more light needs hit on the subject of surgically altering a dog for this reason. Dogs bark as part of their means of communication. It’s mean to take that away from them, unless there is a medical reason behind the act.

So after I read the main story, I did the typical Internet search for the rest of the story. It did not take long.

A post on the ohmidog! blog from February of 2010 quoted David Frei, the longtime co-host of the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show, as saying – “There is no question we have some debarked dogs among our entries.”

The post rightfully notes some veterinarians refuse to perform the surgery on ethical grounds. Some states have banned debarking for reasons other than those medically necessary. Banfield, the national veterinary hospital chain, as banned the surgeries in cases where barking is the issue.

So the question becomes – Why does the Westminster show allow it? I guess a big number of these show people just don’t want to be around the noise. They have ribbons and trophies to win. They can’t be bothered by barking.

We live with 10 rescue dogs and at times a few of them get really excited and they bark like crazy. In fact, as I’m typing this post, my wife just pulled up into the driveway and they’ve showing off their vocal abilities. It’s loud and it can be annoying at times, but I would never ‘debark’ them. It’s cruel and it should be banned everywhere.

For dogs that neighbors complain about, from their barking in the backyard, there is a solution. Bring them inside. Don’t make them live outside, where the constant barking can be annoying.

 

 

PUPS Act – to close the Internet loophole for dog breeders – was introduced on Wednesday

No Gravatar

Great news today. The Puppy Uniform Protection and Safety Act (The PUPS Act) was introduced Wednesday in the US Congress. And in equally good news, it is a bipartisan effort. The bill’s sponsors, as reported by the USA Today, are Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and David Vitter, R-La., and Reps. Jim Gerlach, R-Pa., Sam Farr, D-Calif., Bill Young, R-Fla., and Lois Capps, D-Calif.

Online puppy sellers are slipping around USDA regulations and inspections, because the Animal Welfare Act became the law of the land before the Internet rolled around. So the USA Today story notes -

The PUPS Act will require all breeders who sell more than 50 dogs annually — whether through pet stores or online — to undergo inspections and meet U.S. Department of Agriculture standards for caring for the dogs.

This should be a sweep in both the House and Senate, but I can image a few uneducated elected officials voting with their special interests puppet masters and against this important legislation.

If passed, we need to see funding made available to the USDA for inspections and more enforcement.

 

Bob Barker teaming with ADI to stop the exploitation of elephants at fairs

No Gravatar

Bob Barker continues his ongoing efforts in helping animals, and this time it’s elephants. The former Price is Right host is teaming with Animal Defenders International (ADI) to bring attention to the suffering of elephants used at fairs.

The Press Release -

“” “”

Bob Barker Spearheads New ADI Campaign to End Elephant Suffering at Fairs

February 28, 2013, LOS ANGELES, CA – Animal Defenders International (ADI) has launched the first nationwide initiative in the United States about the use of elephants giving rides or making appearances at public events.  At the heart of the campaign is a new DVD narrated by Emmy award winning TV host Bob Barker entitled ‘No Fun For Elephants,’ featuring harrowing undercover footage from inside elephant training facilities in California, as well as abuse of an elephant on tour by a Texas-owned company.

Bob Barker introduces the video, “To many, it looks like harmless fun, but elephants pay a heavy price for the few minutes of entertainment they provide when performing in circus shows, giving rides, or making appearances at parades, weddings or other events.  Most of us marvel at the majesty of wild animals and I can understand why people want to see animals like elephants up close.  But isn’t it especially tragic when animals are suffering and being abused simply to entertain us?”

Continue reading Bob Barker teaming with ADI to stop the exploitation of elephants at fairs →